Here's my $.02
Regarding your post on the other forum: look around this site, I would wager that the majority of the people you run into in the C4 forum are not just "old". As a matter of fact I was somewhat surprised that the average age of C$ owner on this forum is younger thatn I expected.
Cost/performance: you make a big jump in cost going from a '96 to a '97. The C4s are still on the downslope for prices, so you can get a car that over time may start increasing in value, at least it isn't going to depreciate like the SVTs. You will get a much better maintained '94-'96 for your price range than a '97 or '98.
Performance: beyond the numbers, I have seen several articles talking about how the c4s are actually much better autocross cars than the c5s until you get to Z06. In strait line driving 1/4 mile at a time, thats a different story. The LT1 was a limited production year engine, you will find more performance mods over time for the LS1(check out a post here the other day about engine differences "LT1,LT4,LS1,LS6.... Whats the difference?") I worked on the design of the contour...no contest c4 wins on performance,fit, and styling hands down in my book.
Either C4 or C5 its a whole different world that driving a "performance sedan." I have a '98 regal GS (supercharged 240HP V6) that feels like a real sedan after driving the vette (I tried to fool myself into thinking it felt sporty for a while.)![]()




1Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Lots of folks out there bashing the C4...what gives?
Reply With Quote
of course the other guy was in a c4








Bookmarks