Bookmark This Page | Recommend This Page
 

Industry Partners
Art
Brakes
Dealers
Baystate Motorsports
Corvette Mike New England

E-mail: Chris Warren
E-mail: Kevin Will


E-mail: Ron Ignelzi
Driving Schools
General
Carseek
Parts & Accessories
Corvette Guys
Custom Corvette Accessories
Ecklers
Zip Products

Go Back   Corvette Action Center > News and Introductions > News and Announcements Forum


News and Announcements Forum For Corvette related press releases and general site announcements only.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-04-06, 12:02 PM   #1 (permalink)
Rob
Site Administrator
Rob is offline
 
Rob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: CAC
Posts: 18,428
My Corvette(s):
The mythical 1990 ZR-1
Default New York Times: That ’70s ’Vette: Just Another Girly Car?

That ’70s ’Vette: Just Another Girly Car?

by Jeff Sebatini, New York Times

BY the time “Invasion of the Body Snatchers” arrived in movie theaters in 1978, it was clear that something evil had been sucking the mechanical soul out of sleek-skinned Corvettes for several years.

The third-generation Corvette made its debut as a 1968 model, based on the same mechanicals as the 1963-67 car, but with a new, outrageously styled body. It would become the longest-running Corvette body style, remaining in production through 1982, though undergoing extensive updates during this time. Over its long run, the C3, as enthusiasts refer to the entire run, would reach both the apex and nadir of Corvette performance.

The peak came early. In 1969, Chevrolet offered the most powerful Corvette to date, the ZL1. This was an optional engine package with an all-aluminum, 427-cubic-inch, big-block V-8. Listed at 430 horsepower, the engine’s true output has been reported at more than 550. Only two ZL1 Corvettes were built, as the steep price of the option ($4,718.35) nearly doubled that of the car itself.

Things went downhill quickly, as G.M. began detuning its high-performing V-8s in 1971, reducing the compression ratio so they would run on unleaded gasoline. Then, in 1972, the auto industry changed the way it reported horsepower, switching from gross horsepower to a net measurement that took into account losses from necessities like the alternator and water pump. Advertised horsepower dropped, even when there were no mechanical changes.

By 1975, the big-block engines had been dropped from the sports cars and the Corvette’s standard 350-cubic-inch V-8 was rated at just 165 horsepower. This was the lowest output in a Corvette since the first year of production in 1953, when all Corvettes were equipped with six-cylinder engines.

And the emasculated C3 faced another problem — poor assembly quality. In this era, defects were common and not limited to the Corvette’s chronically ill-fitting body panels. Engines often ran poorly, did not idle well, and were lacking in throttle response.

While this was far from the image of performance that the Corvette had cultivated, the rest of the auto industry wasn’t faring much better. Car and Driver magazine still crowned the Corvette the fastest American car in 1976. (Its reported 0-60 m.p.h. time of 7.1 seconds is just a tick slower than most of today’s midsize sedans.) And no matter how far its performance might have slipped as the decade wore on, the C3 still looked the part of a supercar.

Perhaps that explains why sales increased, even as power decreased. Production peaked in 1979, when Chevy sold 53,807 Corvettes — the most of any model year to date.

Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/05/au...es/05SPIN.html
__________________
Rob Loszewski, Site Administrator
Corvette Action Center
NCRS Member #27792
"Let your plans be dark and impenetrable as night, and when you move, fall like a thunderbolt." - Sun Tzu

Corvette Action Center Spotlight - We have teamed up with Zip Products to create the finest purchase experience for our members:




Industry Partners - Supporting Membership - Advertising Information
  Reply w/ Quote |
Old 11-18-06, 01:35 PM   #2 (permalink)
Registered User
mvarga is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 51
My Corvette(s):
1998 Red convertible,2002 Millennium Yellow vert
Default

Great read. I hate to put down any Corvette, but I have to agree. I currently own 2 C5s. But when I was single(back when dinosaurs roamed the Earth)I owned a '75 coupe. Though the car was gorgeous, it had no power. It constantly had break problems, various annoying stupid little problems with the door handles and so on. But it was still the sweetest looking ride on the road. I sold her shortly after I got married 22 years ago because it wasn't the most practical car to have, then living in Queens NY with only the street to park it in. I was afraid it would get stolen, so I sold it and bought a new Monte Carlo. The Monte was stolen in 2 weeks!!!! We just recently moved to Atlanta. We're empty nester's because our son goes to college in NY and we each drive our own C5. How's that for going full circle???
  Reply w/ Quote |
Old 11-20-06, 10:58 AM   #3 (permalink)
Member
Zippy is offline
 
Zippy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Mt Juliet, TN
Posts: 622
My Corvette(s):
2008 "427" Limited Edition Z06
Default

I had a 1978 Indy Pace Car, and agree, it was not the quickest Vette, but the body style is still one exciting to me.

Part of the problem was the Government initiating emission regulations which forced the big 3 to comply.
__________________
Zippy
"427" Limited Edition 08 Z06
NCM Master Ambassador & Lifetime Member
  Reply w/ Quote |
Old 11-20-06, 12:23 PM   #4 (permalink)
Member
Norseman is offline
 
Norseman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Illinois
Posts: 378
My Corvette(s):
2006 Blue Z51 Coupe/2004 STi for the snow.
Default Girl Car?

I don't get the Girly car part. My brother had a 73 and it was one sweet machine, special racing trany, dark blue, and ran real good except when you had the air on-then hoses tended to blow apart under the hood-not much room under that bonnet, got real hot in there!
__________________
For those who have fought for it, freedom has a taste the protected will never know. HM1 1st MAR DIV.

Last edited by Norseman; 11-26-06 at 02:43 PM. Reason: wrong info.
  Reply w/ Quote |
Old 11-26-06, 11:13 AM   #5 (permalink)
Member
chevy6673 is offline
 
chevy6673's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: illinois,crete
Posts: 259
My Corvette(s):
1973 Corvette ,1966 ss impala
Default

yes anyone that knowns anything about cars knows that in the 70s all sports cars lost a lot of horse power .the vettes still looked great and a trip to the local speed shop could fix the rest.
  Reply w/ Quote |
Old 11-28-06, 09:52 AM   #6 (permalink)
Member
gameprop is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 43
My Corvette(s):
2007 Lemans Blue Z06 & 1970 Green LT-1 Coupe
Default

My 70 LT-1 was a Dec 1969 build date. I believe that and the fact that horsepower exceeded engine displacement officially leaves me out of the "70's...girly vette" category
  Reply w/ Quote |
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GS mystery Vette revealed RAW C4 Technical and Performance 119 10-22-05 02:11 AM
Car leans to the left.............. citruspilot C3 Technical and Performance 29 03-24-04 09:22 AM
Torque vs Horsepower - VERY impressive commentary Fiddler's Gold C4 Technical and Performance 4 09-10-02 11:29 AM
Torque vs. HP - VERY interesting commentary. Fiddler's Gold C5 Technical and Performance 1 09-09-02 02:28 PM
Horsepower vs Torque JHL General Automotive Discussion 7 06-14-02 05:36 AM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0