| Industry Partners |
Art
|
Brakes
|
Dealers
|
Driving Schools
|
General
|
Parts & Accessories
|
|
| C5 Technical and Performance For technical and performance related discussion of 1997 - 2004 Corvettes. |
 |
|
10-08-06, 09:23 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 462
My Corvette(s): '73 4spd coupe, '96 LT4 CE, '04 6 speed coupe
|
C5 seems sluggish compared to my LT4
It just doesn't have the throttle response - no where near what my LT4 vette has and it has 165K on the clock. My seat of the pants accelerometer tells me that my old C4 will blow the doors off my 16K mile (nearly new) C5.
Is that typical for a C5 or is there possibly something wrong with it?
thanks
.
.
.
__________________

lone73
'73 4 spd
'96 LT4 CE
'04 6 spd
|
|
|
Reply w/ Quote |
|
10-08-06, 09:33 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: We Will All Meet Again
Posts: 4,235
My Corvette(s): 1966,2002 & and a 1962 thats almost complete
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lone73
It just doesn't have the throttle response - no where near what my LT4 vette has and it has 165K on the clock. My seat of the pants accelerometer tells me that my old C4 will blow the doors off my 16K mile (nearly new) C5.
Is that typical for a C5 or is there possibly something wrong with it?
thanks
.
.
.
|
I dont know ,I have an 02 C5 with an automatic, Just a cat back exchaust had it dynoed and it had 313 rwhp and any C4 I came a cross we have been able to beat,Its a real refined car so your seat of the pants may be off
These cars go
|
|
|
Reply w/ Quote |
|
10-08-06, 09:40 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: We Will All Meet Again
Posts: 4,235
My Corvette(s): 1966,2002 & and a 1962 thats almost complete
|
|
|
|
Reply w/ Quote |
|
10-08-06, 09:48 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: We Will All Meet Again
Posts: 4,235
My Corvette(s): 1966,2002 & and a 1962 thats almost complete
|
Quick story on how refined the car is.
Last week I was taking my daughter to religious instructions in the the C5, She says hit it Dad were going to be late.So I hit it, The car took off great.
She said
Is that all it got?
Zero to 60 in a couple of seconds
She is used to my 66 or 62 and when you hit it all heck brakes lose
|
|
|
Reply w/ Quote |
|
10-08-06, 09:51 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Old Fort,NC & Vero Beach Fla.
Posts: 3,855
My Corvette(s): 03 Z51 6sp.Cp,01 Z06,94 LT1 6,78 L82 Cp,69 350 3sp
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by IH2LOSE
I dont know ,I have an 02 C5 with an automatic, Just a cat back exchaust had it dynoed and it had 313 rwhp and any C4 I came a cross we have been able to beat,Its a real refined car so your seat of the pants may be off
These cars go
|
Yeah, I had to have my seat Re-Calibrated when I got my C5!!!That darn thing runs Quicker,Faster and Smoother than any vette I've had,and I've had some Fast vettes in my lifetime!!!!I've got a LT4 C4 I took in trade now, and My wife can Blow the doors of it in the C5 and she Can't shift worth a darn!!!
|
|
|
Reply w/ Quote |
|
10-08-06, 10:39 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Rolling Hills NE of Toronto
Posts: 261
My Corvette(s): 1996 Roadster CE/LT4/F45
|
Are you serious about blowing the doors off an LT4?
Quote:
Originally Posted by gmjunkie
Yeah, I had to have my seat Re-Calibrated when I got my C5!!!That darn thing runs Quicker,Faster and Smoother than any vette I've had,and I've had some Fast vettes in my lifetime!!!!I've got a LT4 C4 I took in trade now, and My wife can Blow the doors of it in the C5 and she Can't shift worth a darn!!! 
|
Really? As an LT4 owner I find this a little difficult to accept. Your 03 C5 is pretty fast and may be (note I said may be) a tad faster than an LT4, but it would hardly " blow the doors off" one. Especially by someone who can't " shift worth a darn". Try posting that statement in the LT4 forum if you don't believe me.
Better check that C4 you took in trade and see how it's running as I suspect it is not in top health....I've driven late model C5's. Stock versus stock they don't "blow the doors" off a healthy LT4. And when your wife was driving the C5, who was at the wheel of the LT4?....or was it still parked at the trade in lot.
Don't get me wrong, I like C5's. But LS1's do not crush LT4's which is what you basically said. In a head to head with an LT4 and a 2003 LS1 the performance difference would probably come down to the drivers.....
You would not be the first person to underestimate an LT4, nor their owners.....
Have a nice day.
RG
|
|
|
Reply w/ Quote |
|
10-08-06, 11:39 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Supporting Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 4,918
My Corvette(s): 2002 electron blue Z06, 2001 BMW 330xi
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadster Guy
Really? As an LT4 owner I find this a little difficult to accept. Your 03 C5 is pretty fast and may be (note I said may be) a tad faster than an LT4, but it would hardly "blow the doors off" one. Especially by someone who can't " shift worth a darn". Try posting that statement in the LT4 forum if you don't believe me.
Better check that C4 you took in trade and see how it's running as I suspect it is not in top health....I've driven late model C5's. Stock versus stock they don't "blow the doors" off a healthy LT4. And when your wife was driving the C5, who was at the wheel of the LT4?....or was it still parked at the trade in lot.
Don't get me wrong, I like C5's. But LS1's do not crush LT4's which is what you basically said. In a head to head with an LT4 and a 2003 LS1 the performance difference would probably come down to the drivers.....
You would not be the first person to underestimate an LT4, nor their owners.....
Have a nice day.
RG
|
This reflects what I have seen at the drag strip. The LT4 is a very capable engine.
__________________
Save the Wave!
|
|
|
Reply w/ Quote |
|
10-08-06, 11:59 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Rolling Hills NE of Toronto
Posts: 261
My Corvette(s): 1996 Roadster CE/LT4/F45
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRTH VTR
This reflects what I have seen at the drag strip. The LT4 is a very capable engine.
|
Thank you DRH VTR for verifying that. Therefore, in regards to the opening question by lone 73, I think your C5's power should feel similar to or slightly stronger than your C4 LT4. The fact it doesn't is either the C5 is not running right or it is a matter of perception; the smother and quieter C5 just appears to be slower which is the point IH2LOSE was making.
RG
|
|
|
Reply w/ Quote |
|
10-09-06, 05:53 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Supporting Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 5th Wheeling & Lebanon, MO
Posts: 6,389
My Corvette(s): Millennium Yellow Y2K/MN6/Z51/LS6 Roadster
|
Having owned an LT4 and now an LS1, they both run great! I think it would be a close run between the two and the driver with the best driving skills would probably win.
Later . . . . . .
6 Shooter
|
|
|
Reply w/ Quote |
|
10-09-06, 06:41 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: n. INDIANA
Posts: 102
My Corvette(s): 2002 Electron Blue LS 1 coupe
|
A C4 "feels" more aggressive than a C5, but now that I'm getting used to my C5 coupe I must say it is rather decieving compared to my 2 C4s. All are capable cars, but on the bumpy cowtrails that pass for 2 lane backroads around here my C5 stays planted whereas the C4s got really "exciting"....of course airbourne wheels don't have good grip do they?
Also, the additional foot and leg room in my C5 is most welcome, plus the ease of ingress/egress......oh yes the additional 50 hp compared to my humble LT1 isn't bad either!
Either way, very nice cars! DFO
|
|
|
Reply w/ Quote |
|
10-09-06, 10:05 AM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Supporting Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: West Townsend, MA
Posts: 2,697
My Corvette(s): 2001 Quicksilver Lingenfelter Convertible
|
I agree - the two cars (performance wise) would be nearly a dead heat.
Remo
__________________
2001 Quicksilver Lingenfelter Vert. 6 Speed, 457 RWHP, T-One
Suspension, Kooks Headers, high flow cats, X-pipe, Borla Stingers.
|
|
|
Reply w/ Quote |
|
10-09-06, 11:12 AM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 462
My Corvette(s): '73 4spd coupe, '96 LT4 CE, '04 6 speed coupe
|
Well, I can tell you that when I jab the gas about halfway down in the C4 rounding a sharp corner the LT4 car will break loose and start to swap ends pretty strongly. When I punch it from a dead stop the power is right there. Acceleration is IMMEDIATE. The C5 is refined and a joy to drive but it definitely has to be given a second or two for the revs to come up which makes for a much more docile ride.
If I had to choose between a brand new LT4 car or a brand new C5. I'd take the LT4 anyday. Its a serious beast by comparison.
thanks for the responses.
Last edited by lone73; 10-09-06 at 12:00 PM.
|
|
|
Reply w/ Quote |
|
10-09-06, 01:24 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
Supporting Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Mustang, OK
Posts: 2,284
My Corvette(s): 06 DSOM coupe, 08 Silver Vert, 04 CTS-V
|
I agree with Remo on this. I've owned an LT4 CE C4 and I have an LS1 C5. I had the opportunity to play with both. A friend with a 2000 A4 G92 car and I with the LT4 CE had a few runs together and it was a dead heat between the two cars from 20 to 130.
Checking the Grand Sport Registry's dyno pages show that most GS LT4 cars dyno in the low 300 HP range which is right where the LS1 cars seem to be also.
Driver skill will be the deciding factor in most comparisons between the two cars.
BTW, the C4 and C5 have such totally different feed back and seat of the pants feel that personal impression is almost worthless when comparing them. When I first started driving the C5, I thought it was too soft and didn't feel nearly as edgy or fast as my C4 then I started autocrossing them at the same place and same day and found the C5 to be very fast yet it didn't "feel" fast. All I can say is "WOW".
__________________
Captain Tuna
NCM Fighter Squadron
2009 Corvette Caravan Captain
Oklahoma/Texas Panhandle
|
|
|
Reply w/ Quote |
|
10-09-06, 02:07 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Northern Indiana
Posts: 3,264
My Corvette(s): 1987 Z52 Black Convertible
|
Yeah the feel between the cars are totally different. It is like comparing apples to oranges...
|
|
|
Reply w/ Quote |
|
10-09-06, 02:33 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
Supporting Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 1,403
My Corvette(s): 1999 Pewter FRC
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lone73
Well, I can tell you that when I jab the gas about halfway down in the C4 rounding a sharp corner the LT4 car will break loose and start to swap ends pretty strongly. When I punch it from a dead stop the power is right there. Acceleration is IMMEDIATE. The C5 is refined and a joy to drive but it definitely has to be given a second or two for the revs to come up which makes for a much more docile ride.
If I had to choose between a brand new LT4 car or a brand new C5. I'd take the LT4 anyday. Its a serious beast by comparison.
thanks for the responses.
|
This is a testament to the C5 chassis technology. Care had to be taken not to do anything sudden in curves as the rear end would become unsettled very easily and I was never real confident of the handling. The C5 is much more stable in the twisties and does not have the snap oversteer feeling the C4 would have. I have driven a heavily modifed LT4 and seat of the pants my 99FRC felt faster, especially when the revs come up. I think the LT4 develops more torque at lower RPM and helps that seat of the pants feel you are talking about.
Personally, I will take my FRC over the C4.
Leon
|
|
|
Reply w/ Quote |
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|