Bookmark This Page | Recommend This Page
 

Industry Partners
Art
Brakes
Dealers
Baystate Motorsports
Corvette Mike New England

E-mail: Chris Warren
E-mail: Kevin Will


E-mail: Ron Ignelzi
Driving Schools
General
Carseek
Parts & Accessories
Corvette Guys
Custom Corvette Accessories
Ecklers
Zip Products

Go Back   Corvette Action Center > General Corvette Forums > General Automotive Discussion


General Automotive Discussion For the discussion of general automotive industry topics not specific to Corvettes.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-22-03, 10:49 AM   #1 (permalink)
Member
RLE80L48 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 64
My Corvette(s):
1980 Black L82
Default Lifter Ratio

How do you determine what ratio rocker arms need to be? 1.5 - 1.6 What and where is measured?
  Reply w/ Quote |
Old 09-23-03, 03:36 AM   #2 (permalink)
Administrator
Tom Bryant is offline
 
Tom Bryant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Edgerton, OH USA
Posts: 7,962
My Corvette(s):
1959 black 270hp (9/2/69) 1981 Beige L81(10/20/80)
Default

This may be an over simplification but a cam lobe has to fit through the cam bearing in order to facilitate installation. The cam bearing diameter is determined by the design of the block and this restriction limits the bearing size. Therefore in order to obtain the amount of valve lift desired the cam lobe lift has to be increased by the ratio of the rocker arm. More lobe lift can be obtained by using a special grind reduced base circle cam and longer pushrods. This is an extreme case though.

On a 1.5:1 rocker arm the valve end is longer and moves 1 1/2 times the distance that the push rod end moves. For example, if the cam lobe lift is .300 then the valve will open .450. As for why a particular ratio is used it is a balance of geometry and physical design parimeters. The valves need to be set in the head at a specified angle and the lobe can only be so tall so a 1.5:1 rocker will do the job without putting the pushrod, rocker and valve stem at too great of an angle. That's why 1.6 is about as far as you want to go on a small block although I have heard of1.7s in some cases with modified valve covers for clearance.The valve stems would have to be angled away from the rocker studs to use higher ratios and keep the rocker tips centered on the stem. That would require different head castings.

I hope this helps,
Tom
  Reply w/ Quote |
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0