All right, I'm sick of this... Let's have it: ZR-1 VS. LT-4

[Brett]

I am new to this forum, and I have been reading through all of the ZR-1 vs. LT-4 threads on both this forum and the LT-4 forum. No one can seem to come up with a straight answer to what would appear to be a simple question.

I never thought these two vehicles were even comparable until I came to this forum. It seems to me like the ZR-1 should be miles ahead of the LT-4. And I'm talking stock---no "bang for the buck" crap.

What are:

0 to 60 times of each car?

and

Quarter mile times of each car?

I just think there has been a lot of faulty data posted on this (one guy claimed his LT-4 pulled 191 mph! Give me a break!). Yes, I agree it was very likely the LT-4 was underrated, and is probably more around 345 HP, but even then it is still nowhere near the HP, or power band for that matter, of the LT5.

So let's hear it, flat out--no favoritism or nostalgia involved.



Brett

[YESZREE]

Originally posted by Brett
I am new to this forum, and I have been reading through all of the ZR-1 vs. LT-4 threads on both this forum and the LT-4 forum. No one can seem to come up with a straight answer to what would appear to be a simple question.

I never thought these two vehicles were even comparable until I came to this forum. It seems to me like the ZR-1 should be miles ahead of the LT-4. And I'm talking stock---no "bang for the buck" crap.

What are:

0 to 60 times of each car?

and

Quarter mile times of each car?

I just think there has been a lot of faulty data posted on this (one guy claimed his LT-4 pulled 191 mph! Give me a break!). Yes, I agree it was very likely the LT-4 was underrated, and is probably more around 345 HP, but even then it is still nowhere near the HP, or power band for that matter, of the LT5.

So let's hear it, flat out--no favoritism or nostalgia involved.



Brett

Zr-1 is KOTH and thats it!!!!!!

I realize that you are new to this forum, but geez!

This subject has been run into the ground.

Welcome to the family! This is a great forum.

My advise is drive both, then you will see that all the unsubstanciated banter is just that...banter!!

Later. Ed

[Rob]

Brett,

Welcome to the Corvette Action Center.

I believe that the LT4 owner you refer to who claimed he hit a 191 in his LT4, was NOT stock. It was highly modified.

When the 300 HP LT1 Corvette debuted in 1992, it reigned in the performance of the base Corvette much closer to that of the ZR-1.

The 0-60 mph and 1/4 mile times came much closer to that of the ZR-1. The next logical question would be: "why did a 300 HP LT1 come close to the performance of the 375 hp ZR-1"? Simple - weight and engine design.

The LT5 - being a DOHC design, is not a torque monster off the line. Where DOHC motors really shine is in breathing capacity in the upper RPM band. That's why, at 120+ mph the ZR-1 feels like a locomotive set loose heading towards that 180 mph barrier while the LT1 powered Corvette starts to feel like it's running out of a little steam.

Over the 6 year production span of the ZR-1, the weight of the car gradually increased as well. In 1993, the second generation LT5 was released which brought the output of the ZR-1 to 405 hp. The problem is that the increased weight of the ZR-1 didn't help to really increase the performance gains expected with the increase in horsepower.

With the LT4, you now have a "330 hp" motor (as advertised - probably more like 340 - 345 hp) which is only 35-45 hp below that of a first generation ZR-1. That performance gap just closed even more.

For performance values of both the ZR-1 and the LT4 Corvettes, look here:

LT4: http://corvetteactioncenter.com/specs/1996/96perf.html

LT5: http://corvetteactioncenter.com/specs/zr1/zr1perf.html

[Rob]

Originally posted by YESZREE
Zr-1 is KOTH and thats it!!!!!!

I realize that you are new to this forum, but geez!

This subject has been run into the ground.

Welcome to the family! This is a great forum.

My advise is drive both, then you will see that all the unsubstanciated banter is just that...banter!!

Later. Ed

Ed,

He asked a couple legitimate questions and "Zr-1 is KOTH and thats it!!!!!!" really isn't an answer to his questions.

[Wegone]

The ZR-1 and the LT4 are a close match up 100mph than the ZR-1 just walks away..You have to remember the ZR-1 was never meant to be a ¼ mile runner it was built to go long distance at high speeds from daylight to dark and than some.

[YESZREE]

Originally posted by Rob
Ed,

He asked a couple legitimate questions and "Zr-1 is KOTH and thats it!!!!!!" really isn't an answer to his questions.

Yes Mother. Now I'll go pick up my room, and do my homework.

[Rob]

Originally posted by YESZREE
Yes Mother. Now I'll go pick up my room, and do my homework.

Like I said....he asked for legitimate information - not chest pounding and personal opinion.

Originally posted by Rob
Like I said....he asked for legitimate information - not chest pounding and personal opinion.

Boy Rob, It's hard to be humble when you drive a ZR-1

We'll try harder!!

(Just to make sure, my comments are meant to be in good humor only)

[Rob]

Originally posted by A26B
Boy Rob, It's hard to be humble when you drive a ZR-1

We'll try harder!!

(Just to make sure, my comments are meant to be in good humor only)

Actually, no it isn't hard to be humble when driving a ZR-1. I love my ZR-1, but I don't feel the need to wear it on my chest like it's a badge of honor. It's a Corvette...nothing more, nothing less.

When someone asks me what kind of Corvette I own. I tell them "A 1990". I don't bother mentioning it's a ZR-1 because to me, the type of 1990 it is, is irrelevant.

Now....back to the original point of this thread which was the performance differences between the LT4 and ZR-1....

Very sorry, no offense intended

Originally posted by Rob
Actually, no it isn't hard to be humble when driving a ZR-1. I love my ZR-1, but I don't feel the need to wear it on my chest like it's a badge of honor. It's a Corvette...nothing more, nothing less.

When someone asks me what kind of Corvette I own. I tell them "A 1990". I don't bother mentioning it's a ZR-1 because to me, the type of 1990 it is, is irrelevant.

Now....back to the original point of this thread which was the performance differences between the LT4 and ZR-1....

Rob, I respectfully request that you please remove me as a registered user of the forum.

[Rob]

Originally posted by A26B
Rob, I respectfully request that you please remove me as a registered user of the forum.

Ok....done.

[Rob]

Originally posted by A26B
Very sorry, no offense intended

I didn't take it as being offensive. I just simply replied.

[Vettelt193]

ZR1 vs. LT4 There is no cut and dry answer to this question... It really just depends on what you want to do with the car, how you want to drive it, etc.

ZR1's are long lasting, high horsepower cars...
LT4's are more low-end torque power, with high HP thrown in... (LT4's have an almost flat torque curve)

which one is better? well, which one is better for you?

The LT4 is my better car, because it has more of what I enjoy... low end torque. I don't intend on ever racing my car 24 hours straight, or even doing any top end testing. I use my 'vette on public roads... honestly, it isn't safe driving 180 MPH on a public road.... but, if you can find a back road somewhere, you can certainly get up to a reasonable speed, and also use the quickness of the car... Other benefits are cheaper and easier to find parts, a cheaper car in general (or a car that is 5 or 6 years newer for the same price) and less money for modifications.


So, if you want an endurance top end racer... ZR1
but, if daily street car with more low end torque, LT4 is probably the better choice.

Rob's analysis of the LT5 vs. the LT4 is correct. Other posts are generally correct, too. It just goes to show that you need to make the decision as to what you want and what you are looking for.

While the LT4 may have some minimal advantage over the LT5 in low rpm torque, please understand that it's all relative. The LT5 is no slouch down low, either.

Remember, too, that the LT4 will wind out quicker, meaning (in most circumstances) an extra shift through the gates (assuming that is important to you). Also remember that different LT5's run differently. Just look at all the different tests by the different magazines. The output just wasn't the same across the board, no matter what year. For example, a friend of mine still owns his '90 he bought new. It was originally delivered to Chevy as a factory test car, and subsequently sold to the public with less tha 500 miles on it (the original sticker verifies the origin of the car). Being a former drag racer of the '60's, he promptly took it out to Pomona and turned mid-12's on street tires. Yet, other times can vary as high as the 13's.

I am a fan of both (I have owned 4 Z's) and they both really are "Corvettes" (just like the Z06 is), but if you know how to drive the ZR1, you aren't too concerned about parts, you want the ultimate in Corvette performance, and you have the extra $$ it may take to buy one, I'd go with the ZR1. Either way, you cannot lose.